Guinea | BCH-NR4-GN-280996 | Fourth National Report on the Implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

General Information

Country

Guinea

Contact person submitting the report

CHM-NFP-GN-209958-8 National Focal Points M. Sékou Kourouma

9. Organizations/stakeholders who were consulted or participated in the preparation of this report

Ministère de l’Agriculture et de l’Elevage ; Ministère de la Sante et de l’Hygiène Publique ; Ministère du Commerce, de l’Industrie et des Petites et Moyennes Entreprises ; Ministère de l’Environnement et du Développement Durable ; Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et de l’Innovation ; Ministère du Budget (Douanes) ; Ministère de la Pèche de l’Aquaculture et de l’Economie Maritime ; Fédération des Paysans du Foutah Djallon

FR

10. Time period covered by this report

From

10 Oct 2020

To

14 Oct 2025

Party to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

11. Is your country a Party to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB)?

Yes

EN

Article 2 – General provisions

Article 2 requires each Party to take the necessary and appropriate legal, administrative and other measures to implement its obligations under the Protocol

14. Has your country introduced the necessary national measures for the implementation of the Protocol?

National measures are partially in place

EN

15. Which specific instruments are in place for the implementation of national biosafety measures? (select all that apply)

One or more national biosafety laws
One or more national biosafety regulations

16. Has your country undertaken initiatives to mainstream biosafety into national biodiversity strategies and action plans, other policies, or legislation?

Yes

EN

17. Has your country established a mechanism for budget allocations for the operation of its national biosafety measures?

Yes, to some extent

EN

18. Does your country have permanent staff to administer functions directly related to biosafety?

Yes

EN

19. If you answered Yes to question 18, how many permanent staff members are in place whose functions are directly related to biosafety ?

1 to 4

EN

Is this number adequate

Yes

EN

20. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 2 in your country

Article 5 - Pharmaceuticals

21. Does your country regulate the transboundary movement, handling or use of living modified organisms (LMOs) which are pharmaceuticals to humans?

Yes, to some extent

EN

viewNationalReportT.additionalInformation

Réglemente et contrôle la rentrée des produits forestiers dans le pays

FR

22. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 5 in your country

Article 6 – Transit and Contained use

23. Does your country regulate the transit of LMOs?

Yes, to some extent

EN

24. Does your country regulate the contained use of LMOs?

Yes

EN

25. Has your country taken a decision concerning the import of LMOs for contained use?

Yes

EN

26. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 6 in your country

Articles 7 to 10 – Advance Informed Agreement (AIA) and intentional introduction of LMOs into the environment

27. Has your country established legal requirements for exporters under its jurisdiction to notify in writing the competent national authority of the Party of import prior to the intentional transboundary movement of an LMO that falls within the scope of the AIA procedure?

Yes, to some extent

EN

28. When acting as the Party of export, has your country established legal requirements for the accuracy of information contained in the notification provided by the exporter?

Yes, to some extent

EN

29. In the current reporting period, has your country received a notification regarding intentional transboundary movements of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment?

No

EN

30. If you answered Yes to question 29, did the notification(s) contain complete information (at a minimum the information specified in Annex I to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety)?

31. If you answered Yes to question 29, has your country acknowledged receipt of the notification(s) to the notifier within ninety days of receipt?

32. If you answered Yes to question 29, has your country informed of its decision(s)

a. The notifier?

b. The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)?

33. In the current reporting period, has your country taken a decision in response to the notification(s) regarding intentional transboundary movements of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment?

No

EN

34. If you answered Yes to question 33, how many LMOs has your country approved for import for intentional introduction into the environment?

35. If you answered under question 34 that LMOs were approved, have all these LMOs actually been imported into your country?

36. If you answered Yes to question 33, what percentage of your country’s decisions fall into the following categories? (select all that apply)

37. If you answered under question 36 that your country has taken a decision to approve the import with conditions or to prohibit the import, were the reasons provided?

38. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Articles 7 to 10 in your country, including measures in case of lack of scientific certainty on potential adverse effects of LMOs for intentional introduction to the environment

Article 11 – Procedure for living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (LMOs-FFP)

39. Does your country have law(s), regulation(s) or administrative measures for decision-making regarding domestic use, including placing on the market, of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

No

EN

40. Has your country established legal requirements for the accuracy of information to be provided by the applicant regarding the domestic use, including placing on the market, of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

No

EN

41. In the current reporting period, how many decisions has your country taken regarding domestic use, including placing on the market, of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

None

EN

42. Does your country have law(s), regulation(s) or administrative measures for decision-making regarding the import of LMOs for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

No

EN

43. In the current reporting period, how many decisions has your country taken regarding the import of LMOs for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

None

EN

44. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 11 in your country, including measures in case of lack of scientific certainty on potential adverse effects of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing

Les questions posées à l’article 11 sont traitées par les deux (2) projets de Lois sur la biosécurité en cours d’adoption et de promulgation

FR

Article 12 – Review of decision

45. Has your country established a mechanism for the review and change of a decision regarding an intentional transboundary movement of LMOs?

No

EN

46. In the current reporting period, has your country reviewed and/or changed a decision regarding an intentional transboundary movement of an LMO?

No

EN

47. If you answered Yes to question 46, how many decisions were reviewed and/or changed?

48. If you answered Yes to question 46, were any of the reviews triggered by a request from the Party of export or the notifier?

49. If you answered Yes to question 48, did your country provide a response within ninety days setting out the reasons for the decision?

50. If you answered Yes to question 46, were any of the reviews initiated by your country as the Party of import?

51. If you answered Yes to question 50, did your country, within thirty days, set out the reasons for the decision and inform

a. The notifier

b. The BCH?

52. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 12 in your country

A date, la Guinée ne dispose pas de mécanisme de reconsidération et de modification d’une décision concernant un mouvement transfrontière intentionnel d’OGM.

FR

Article 13 – Simplified procedure

53. Has your country established a mechanism for the application of the simplified procedure regarding an intentional transboundary movement of LMOs?

No

EN

54. In the current reporting period, has your country applied the simplified procedure?

No

EN

55. If you answered Yes to question 54, for how many LMOs has your country applied the simplified procedure?

56. If you answered Yes to question 54, has your country informed the Parties through the BCH of the cases where the simplified procedure was applied?

57. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 13 in your country

Article 14 – Bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements and arrangements

58. How many bilateral, regional or multilateral agreements or arrangements relevant to biosafety has your country established with other Parties/non-Parties?

None

EN

59. If you answered under question 58 that agreements or arrangements were established, please provide a brief description of their scope and objective

60. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 14 in your country

A date, la Guinée n’a pas conclu d'accords bilatéraux relatifs à la prévention des risques biotechnologiques. Cependant la République de Guinée participe aux travaux d’élaboration des règlements sur la Biosécurité aux niveaux de la CEDAO et de l’Union Aussi, elle est membre du Comité de Pilotage du Programme sous régional de la Lutte contre les vecteurs de maladies dans le cadre du Programme GENE DRIVE avec le NEPAD. Par ailleurs, il est à noter que l’Institut National de Recherche Agronomique de Guinée (IRAG), à travers son programme d’échange de matériel végétal avec des Institutions spécialisées telles que l’IITA, l’ADRAO, l’IRI, s’interdit l’utilisation des produits issus de la Biotechnologie moderne.

FR

Articles 15 & 16 – Risk Assessment and Risk Management

61. Does the domestic regulatory framework of your country require risk assessments of LMOs to be conducted?

Yes

EN

62. If you answered Yes to question 61, with regard to which LMOs does the requirement apply (select all that apply)?

For imports of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment
For imports of LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing
For imports of LMOs for contained use

63. Has your country established a mechanism to conduct risk assessments prior to taking decisions regarding LMOs?

Yes

EN

64. If you answered Yes to question 63, does the mechanism include procedures to identify and/or train national experts to conduct risk assessments?

Yes

EN

Capacity-building in risk assessment or risk management

65. How many people in your country have been trained in risk assessment, risk management and monitoring of LMOs?

a. Risk assessment

None

EN

Is this number adequate

b. Risk management

None

EN

Is this number adequate

c. Monitoring

None

EN

Is this number adequate

66. Is your country using training material and/or technical guidance for training in risk assessment and risk management of LMOs?

No

EN

67. If you answered Yes to question 66, is your country using the “Manual on Risk Assessment of LMOs” (developed by the CBD Secretariat) for training in risk assessment?

68. If you answered Yes to question 66, is your country using the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of LMOs” (developed by the Online Forum and the AHTEG on Risk Assessment and Risk Management) for training in risk assessment?

69. Does your country have specific needs for further guidance on specific topics of risk assessment of LMOs?

Yes

EN

70. Does your country have the capacity to detect, identify, assess the risk of and/or monitor living modified organisms or specific traits that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking into account risks to human health?

a. Detect

No

EN

b. Identify

No

EN

c. Assess the risk

No

EN

d. Monitor

No

EN

Conducting risk assessment or risk management

71. Has your country adopted or used any guidance documents for the purpose of conducting risk assessment or risk management, or for evaluating risk assessment reports submitted by notifiers?

a. Risk assessment

No

EN

b. Risk management

No

EN

72. If you answered Yes to question 71, is your country using the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of LMOs” (developed by the Online Forum and the AHTEG on Risk Assessment and Risk Management) for conducting risk assessment or risk management, or for evaluating risk assessment reports submitted by notifiers?

73. Has your country adopted common approaches or methodologies to risk assessment in coordination with other countries?

No

EN

74. Has your country cooperated with other Parties with a view to identifying LMOs or specific traits that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity?

No

EN

75. In the current reporting period, has your country conducted any kind of risk assessment of LMOs, including for contained use, field trials, commercial purposes, direct use as food, feed, or for processing?

No

EN

76. If you answered Yes to question 75, how many risk assessments were conducted?

77. If you answered Yes to question 75, please indicate the scope of the risk assessments (select all that apply)

78. If you answered Yes to question 75, were risk assessments conducted for all decisions taken on LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment or on domestic use of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

79. Has your country established appropriate mechanisms, measures and strategies to regulate and manage risks identified in the risk assessment of LMOs?

Yes

EN

80. Has your country taken appropriate measures to prevent unintentional transboundary movements of LMOs, including such measures as requiring a risk assessment to be carried out prior to the first release of a LMO?

Yes

EN

81. Has your country taken measures to ensure that any LMO, whether imported or locally developed, undergoes an appropriate period of observation that is commensurate with its life-cycle or generation time before it is put to its intended use?

Yes

EN

82. Has your country established a mechanism for monitoring potential effects of LMOs released into the environment?

No

EN

83. Does your country have the necessary infrastructure (e.g. laboratory facilities) for monitoring or managing LMOs?

No

EN

84. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Articles 15 and 16 in your country

Le projet de Loi sur la biosécurité élaborée par le Ministère en charge de l’Environnement règlemente tous les aspects liés à l’évaluation et à la gestion des risques des OGM. Aucune des structures visitées ne dispose d’infrastructures pour le suivi ou la gestion des OGM. Toutefois, le Centre de Recherche Agronomique de Foulaya avait un embryon de laboratoire de biotechnologie ; insuffisamment équipé, qui n’a pas pu fonctionner.

FR

Article 17 – Unintentional transboundary movements² and emergency measures

² In accordance with the operational definition adopted in decision CP-VIII/16, “‘Unintentional transboundary movement’ is a transboundary movement of a living modified organism that has inadvertently crossed the national borders of a Party where the living modified organism was released, and the requirements of Article 17 of the Protocol apply to such transboundary movements only if the living modified organism involved is likely to have significant adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, in the affected or potentially affected States.”

85. Has your country established measures to notify affected or potentially affected States, the Biosafety Clearing-House and, where appropriate, relevant international organizations in case of a release under its jurisdiction that leads, or may lead, to an unintentional transboundary movement?

Yes

EN

86. In the current reporting period, how many releases of LMOs occurred under your country’s jurisdiction that led, or may have led, to an unintentional transboundary movement?

None

EN

87. If you answered under question 86 that a release occurred, has your country notified affected or potentially affected States, the Biosafety Clearing-House and, where appropriate, relevant international organizations?

88. Does your country have the capacity to take appropriate response measures in response to unintentional transboundary movements?

No

EN

89. In the current reporting period, how many times has your country become aware of an unintentional transboundary movement into its territory?

None

EN

90. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 17 in your country

A date, l’Autorité Nationale Compétente n’a pas reçu de notifications relatives à un mouvement transfrontière non intentionnel d’OGM.

FR

Article 18 – Handling, transport, packaging and identification

91. Has your country taken measures to require that LMOs that are subject to transboundary movement are handled, packaged and transported under conditions of safety, taking into account relevant international rules and standards?

Yes

EN

92. Has your country taken measures to require that documentation accompanying LMOs-FFP, in cases where the identity of the LMOs is not known, clearly identifies that they may contain LMOs and are not intended for intentional introduction into the environment, as well as a contact point for further information?

Yes

EN

93. Has your country taken measures to require that documentation accompanying LMOs-FFP, in cases where the identity of the LMOs is known, clearly identifies that they contain LMOs and are not intended for intentional introduction into the environment, as well as a contact point for further information?

Yes

EN

94. If you answered Yes to question(s) 91, 92 and/or 93, what type of documentation accompanying LMOs does your country require?

Documentation specific for LMOs

EN

95. Has your country taken measures to require that documentation accompanying LMOs that are destined for contained use clearly identifies them as LMOs and specifies any requirements for the safe handling, storage, transport and use, the contact point for further information, including the name and address of the individual and institution to whom the LMO are consigned?

Yes

EN

96. If you answered Yes to question 95, what type of documentation does your country require for the identification of LMOs that are destined for contained use?

Documentation specific for LMOs

EN

97. Has your country taken measures to require that documentation accompanying LMOs that are intended for intentional introduction into the environment of the Party of import clearly identifies them as living modified organisms; specifies the identity and relevant traits and/or characteristics, any requirements for the safe handling, storage, transport and use, the contact point for further information and, as appropriate, the name and address of the importer and exporter; and contains a declaration that the movement is in conformity with the requirements of this Protocol applicable to the exporter?

Yes

EN

98. If you answered Yes to question 97, what type of documentation does your country require for the identification of LMOs that are intended for intentional introduction into the environment?

Documentation specific for LMOs

EN

99. Does your country have available any guidance for the purpose of ensuring the safe handling, transport, and packaging of living modified organisms?

Yes

EN

100. Does your country have the capacity to enforce the requirements of identification and documentation of LMOs?

No

EN

101. How many customs officers in your country have received training in the identification of LMOs?

None

EN

Is this number adequate

102. Has your country established procedures for the sampling and detection of LMOs?

No

EN

103. How many laboratory personnel in your country have received training in detection of LMOs?

None

EN

Is this number adequate

104. Does your country have reliable access to laboratory facilities for the detection of LMOs?

No

EN

105. How many laboratories in your country are certified for LMO detection?

None

EN

106. If you answered under question 105 that certified laboratories exist in your country, how many of them are currently operating in the detection of LMOs?

107. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 18 in your country

Le Cadre National de Biosécurité adopté sous forme de Politique Nationale traite au niveau de son Chapitre III de toutes les questions liées à la documentation qui doit accompagner tout mouvement transfrontalier d’OGM. Outre le Centre de Recherche Agronomique de Foulaya (Kindia), les services visités ne disposent de laboratoire, d’équipements et du personnel doté des capacités requises en la matière. Ce Centre disposait d’un embryon de laboratoire qui, par insuffisance de capacités techniques, matérielles et financières n’a pu fonctionner.

FR

Article 19 – Competent National Authorities and National Focal Points

108. In case your country has designated more than one competent national authority, has your country established a mechanism for the coordination of their actions prior to taking decisions regarding LMOs?

Not applicable (no competent national authority was designated)

EN

109. Has your country established adequate institutional capacity to enable the competent national authority(ies) to perform the administrative functions required by the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety?

Yes

EN

110. Has your country undertaken initiatives to strengthen collaboration among national focal points, competent national authority(ies) and other institutions on biosafety-related matters?

Yes

EN

viewNationalReportT.additionalInformation

A date, la République de Guinée ne dispose que d’une Autorité Nationale Compétente en matière de Biosécurité qui est le Ministère de l’Environnement et du Développement Durable. Cependant, le Comité National de Biosécurité qui est un organe consultatif regroupe les représentants des structures publiques, parapubliques et les organisations socio-professionnelles concernées par la Biotechnologie et la Biosécurité.

FR

111. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 19 in your country

La République de Guinée a désigné i) le Ministère en charge de l’Environnement comme Autorité Nationale Compétente et le Point Focal National au Titre du Protocole de Cartagena ; ii) le Point Focal National du BCH et iii) les Points Focaux Institutionnels du BCH au niveau des Ministères en charge de l’Agriculture et de l’Elevage, de la Pêche, de l’Aquaculture, de la Santé, de la Recherche Scientifique et de l’Innovation, du Commerce et de l’industrie et de la Douane. Un Comité National de Biosécurité jouant le rôle d’organe consultatif est également mis en place.

FR

Article 20 – Information Sharing and the Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)

112. Please provide an overview of the status of the mandatory information provided by your country to the BCH by specifying for each category of information whether it is available and whether it has been submitted to the BCH.

a. Existing legislation, regulations and guidelines for implementing the Protocol, as well as information required by Parties for the advance informed agreement procedure (Article 20, paragraph 3 (a))

Information available but only partially available in the BCH

EN

b. Legislation, regulations and guidelines applicable to the import of LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (Article 11, paragraph 5)

Information available and in the BCH

EN

c. Bilateral, multilateral and regional agreements and arrangements (Articles 14, paragraph 2 and 20, paragraph 3 (b))

Information not available

EN

d. Contact details for competent national authorities (Article 19, paragraphs 2 and 3), national focal points (Article 19, paragraphs 1 and 3), and emergency contacts (Article 17, paragraph 3 (e))

Information available and in the BCH

EN

e. Decisions by a Party regarding transit of LMOs (Article 6, paragraph 1)

Information not available

EN

f. Decisions by a Party regarding import of LMOs for contained use (Article 6, paragraph 2)

Information not available

EN

g. Notifications regarding the release under your country’s jurisdiction that leads, or may lead, to an unintentional transboundary movement of a LMO that is likely to have significant adverse effects on biological diversity (Article 17, paragraph 1)

Information not available

EN

h. Information concerning cases of illegal transboundary movements of LMOs (Article 25, paragraph 3)

Information not available

EN

i. Decisions regarding the importation of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment (Article 10, paragraph 3)

Information not available

EN

j. Information on the application of domestic regulations to specific imports of LMOs (Article 14, paragraph 4)

Information not available

EN

k. Decisions regarding the domestic use of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (Article 11, paragraph 1)

Information not available

EN

l. Decisions regarding the import of LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing that are taken under domestic regulatory frameworks (Article 11, paragraph 4) or in accordance with Annex III to the Protocol (Article 11, paragraph 6)

Information not available

EN

m. Declarations regarding the framework to be used for LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (Article 11, paragraph 6)

Information not available

EN

n. Review and change of decisions regarding intentional transboundary movements of LMOs (Article 12, paragraph 1)

Information not available

EN

o. Cases where intentional transboundary movement may take place at the same time as the movement is notified to the Party of import (Article 13, paragraph 1 (a))

Information not available

EN

p. LMOs granted exemption status by each Party (Article 13, paragraph 1 (b))

Information not available

EN

q. Summaries of risk assessments or environmental reviews of LMOs generated by regulatory processes and relevant information regarding products thereof (Article 20, paragraph 3 (c))

Information not available

EN

113. Please provide a brief explanation if you answered that the information is available but not in the BCH or only partially available in the BCH to any item under question 112:

Les Noms, Prénoms et coordonnées du Point Focal National du Protocole de Cartagena et du Point Focal National du BCH sont déjà disponibles sur le Portail Central du BCH. Cependant, les Noms, Prénoms et coordonnées des Points Focaux Institutionnels mis en place au niveau des Ministères en charge de la Santé Publique, de l’Agriculture et de l’Elevage, de la Pêche et de l’aquaculture, du Commerce et de l’Industrie, de la Douane n’ont pas encore été communiqués au niveau du Portail Central du BCH. Les Points Focaux institutionnels initialement désignés au niveau des Ministères ont été admis à faire prévaloir leur droit à la retraite. Une nouvelle désignation de ces Points focaux institutionnel est en cours.

FR

114. Has your country established a mechanism for strengthening the capacity of the BCH National Focal Point to perform its administrative functions?

Yes

EN

115. Has your country established a mechanism for the coordination among the BCH National Focal Point, the Cartagena Protocol focal point, and the competent national authority(ies) for making information available to the BCH?

Yes

EN

116. Does your country use the information available in the BCH in its decision making processes on LMOs?

Not applicable (no decisions were taken)

EN

117. Has your country experienced difficulties accessing or using the BCH?

Yes

EN

viewNationalReportT.additionalInformation

Insuffisance d’équipements informatiques et capacités techniques

FR

118. In the current reporting period, how many biosafety-related events (e.g. seminars, workshops, press conferences, educational events) has your country organized?

1 to 4

EN

119. In the current reporting period, how many biosafety-related publications has your country published?

None

EN

120. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 20 in your country

A date, en dépit des formations reçues et des efforts d’information et de sensibilisations déployés en faveur de certains cadres des Départements ministérielles concernés par les questions de biotechnologie et de biosécurité, l’Autorité Nationale Compétente n’a reçu aucune notification relative à un mouvement ou à une introduction d’OGM. L’insuffisance de matérielle et de compétences techniques ainsi que l’instabilité institutionnelle et politique n’ont pas favorisé les échanges d’informations sur la biotechnologie et la biosécurité, entre les acteurs nationaux et ceux des pays Parties au Protocole.

FR

Article 21 – Confidential information

121. Has your country established procedures to protect confidential information received under the Protocol?

Yes

EN

122. Does your country allow the notifier to identify information that is to be treated as confidential?

Yes, always

EN

123. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 21 in your country

Les questions liées aux informations confidentielles sont traitées i) dans le cadre national de biosécurité notamment dans son chapitre III qui traite des mécanismes et procédures et ii) dans le projet de loi élaboré par le Ministère en charge de l’Environnement.

FR

Article 22 – Capacity-building

124. Does your country have predictable and reliable funding for building capacity for the effective implementation of the Protocol?

No

EN

125. Has your country received external support or benefited from collaborative activities with other Parties in the development and/or strengthening of human resources and institutional capacities in biosafety?

Yes

EN

126. If you answered Yes to question 125, how were these resources made available? (select all that apply)

Regional channels
Multilateral channels

127. Has your country provided support to other Parties in the development and/or strengthening of human resources and institutional capacities in biosafety?

No

EN

128. If you answered Yes to question 127, how were these resources made available? (select all that apply)

129. In the reporting period, has your country initiated a process to access funds from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) for building capacity in biosafety?

Yes

EN

viewNationalReportT.additionalInformation

(Avec l’appui du PNUE, la République de Guinée est phase de finalisation d’un Plan d’Action National sur le renforcement des capacités des cadres en matière de biosécurité).

FR

130. If you answered Yes to question 129, how would you characterize the process?

Difficult

EN

131. In the current reporting period, has your country undertaken activities for the development and/or strengthening of human resources and institutional capacities in biosafety?

Yes

EN

132. If you answered Yes to question 131, in which of the following areas were these activities undertaken (select all that apply)?

Institutional capacity and human resources
Integration of biosafety in cross-sectoral and sectoral legislation, policies and institutions (mainstreaming biosafety)
Risk assessment and other scientific and technical expertise
Risk management
Public awareness, participation and education in biosafety
Information exchange and data management including participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House
Scientific, technical and institutional collaboration at subregional, regional and international levels
Technology transfer
Identification of LMOs, including their detection
Socio-economic considerations
Implementation of the documentation requirements under Article 18.2 of the Protocol
Handling of confidential information
Measures to address unintentional and/or illegal transboundary movements of LMOs
Scientific biosafety research relating to LMOs
Taking into account risks to human health
Liability and redress

133. In the current reporting period, has your country carried out a capacity-building needs assessment?

Yes

EN

134. Does your country still have capacity-building needs?

Yes

EN

135. If you answered Yes to question 134, which of the following areas still need capacity-building (select all that apply)?

Institutional capacity and human resources
Integration of biosafety in cross-sectoral and sectoral legislation, policies and institutions (mainstreaming biosafety)
Risk assessment and other scientific and technical expertise
Risk management
Public awareness, participation and education in biosafety
Information exchange and data management including participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House
Scientific, technical and institutional collaboration at subregional, regional and international levels
Technology transfer
Sampling, detection and identification of LMOs
Socio-economic considerations
Implementation of the documentation requirements for handling, transport, packaging and identification
Handling of confidential information
Measures to address unintentional and/or illegal transboundary movements of LMOs
Scientific biosafety research relating to LMOs
Taking into account risks to human health
Liability and redress

136. Has your country developed a capacity-building strategy or action plan?

Yes

EN

137. Does your country have in place a functional national mechanism for coordinating biosafety capacity-building initiatives?

No

EN

138. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 22 in your country, including further details about your experience in accessing GEF funds:

Le Plan d’Action National sur le renforcement des capacités transmis au PNUE, au mois de mai 2022 traite de plusieurs aspects liés au renforcement des capacités institutionnelle, matérielles et du personnel.

FR

Article 23 – Public awareness and participation

139. Is biosafety public awareness, education and/or participation addressed in legislation or policy in your country?

Yes

EN

140. In the current reporting period, has your country cooperated with other States and international bodies in relation to public awareness, education and participation?

No

EN

141. Has your country established a mechanism to ensure public access to information on LMOs?

Yes

EN

142. Does your country have in place a national communication strategy on biosafety?

No

EN

143. Does your country have any awareness and outreach programmes on biosafety?

Yes

EN

viewNationalReportT.additionalInformation

Oui : des ateliers d’information et de sensibilisation seront organisés en 2002, dans les quatre (4) régions naturelles du pays. En plus, une session d’information sera organisée à l’attention des membres du Conseil National de la Transition (CNT) sur les dispositions de la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique et celles du protocole de Cartagena sur la biosécurité, afin de faciliter l’examen des Projets de Lois qui seront soumis pour adoption.

FR

144. Does your country currently have a national biosafety website?

No

EN

145. How many academic institutions in your country are offering biosafety education and training courses and programmes?

None

EN

Is this number adequate

146. How many educational materials and/or online modules on biosafety are available and accessible to the public in your country?

None

EN

Is this number adequate

147. Has your country established a mechanism to consult the public in the decision-making process regarding LMOs?

Yes

EN

148. Has your country informed the public about existing modalities for public participation in the decision-making process regarding LMOs?

No

EN

149. If you answered Yes to question 148, please indicate the modalities used to inform the public: (select all that apply)

150. In the current reporting period, how many times has your country consulted the public in the decision-making process regarding LMOs?

None (decisions taken without consultation)

EN

151. Has your country informed the public about the means to access the Biosafety Clearing-House?

No

EN

152. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 23 in your country

La Cadre National de Biosécurité à son Point 4.2 (Stratégie et Plan d’Action) consacre l’information et la sensibilisation du public guinéen sur les enjeux de la Biosécurité comme un objectif à atteindre. En plus des mesures mises en place par le Cadre National de Biosécurité adopté par le Gouvernement, les dispositions légales en cours d’adoption traitent de l’information et de la sensibilisation du public, en matière de biosécurité. Le public n’a pas été consulté pendant la période visée par ce rapport, car aucune décision n’a eu lieu, à date.

FR

Article 24 – Non-Parties

153. Has your country entered into any bilateral, regional, or multilateral agreement with non-Parties regarding transboundary movements of LMOs?

No

EN

154. In the current reporting period, has your country imported LMOs from a non-Party?

No

EN

155. In the current reporting period, has your country exported LMOs to a non-Party?

No

EN

156. If you answered Yes to question 154 and/or 155, were the transboundary movements of LMOs consistent with the objective of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety?

157. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 24 in your country

A date, l’Autorité Nationale Compétente n’a pas été saisie d’un cas d’importation d’OGM sur le territoire national. La Guinée n’étant pas productrice d’OGM, elle n’en exporte pas.

FR

Article 25 – Illegal transboundary movements³

³In accordance with the operational definition adopted in decision CP VIII/16, “‘Illegal transboundary movement’ is a transboundary movement of living modified organisms carried out in contravention of the domestic measures to implement the Protocol that have been adopted by the Party concerned”.

158. Has your country adopted domestic measures aimed at preventing and/or penalizing transboundary movements of LMOs carried out in contravention of its domestic measures to implement the Cartagena Protocol?

Yes

EN

159. In the current reporting period, how many cases of illegal transboundary movements of LMOs has your country become aware of?

None

EN

160. If you indicated under question 159 that your country became aware of cases of illegal transboundary movements, has the origin of the LMO(s) been established?

161. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 25 in your country

En général, le Code l’environnement susmentionné dispose sur la Biosécurité. De manière spécifique, les dispositions pénales des projets de Lois sanctionnent toute violation des mesures mise en place en matière de mouvements transfrontières illicites d’OGM.

FR

Article 26 – Socio-economic considerations

162. Does your country have any specific approaches or requirements that facilitate how socioeconomic considerations should be taken into account in LMO decision-making?

No

EN

163. In the current reporting period, have socioeconomic considerations arising from the impact of LMOs been taken into account in decision-making?

No

EN

164. How many peer-reviewed published materials has your country used for the purpose of elaborating or determining national actions with regard to socioeconomic considerations?

None

EN

Is this number adequate

165. Has your country cooperated with other Parties on research and information exchange on any socioeconomic impacts of LMOs?

No

EN

166. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 26 in your country

Les aspects liés aux considérations socioéconomiques ne sont pas suffisamment élucidés dans le projet de Loi sur la Biosécurité ainsi que dans le document du cadre national de biosécurité. Ils seront traités dans la stratégie nationale de gestion des risques biotechnologiques.

FR

Article 28 – Financial Mechanism and Resources

167. In the current reporting period, how much funding (in the equivalent of US dollars) has your country mobilized to support implementation of the Cartagena Protocol beyond the regular national budgetary allocation?

500,000 USD or more

EN

Article 33 – Monitoring and reporting

Article 33 requires Parties to monitor the implementation of its obligations under the Cartagena Protocol and to report to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on measures taken to implement the Protocol

168. Does your country have in place a system to monitor and enforce the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol?

Yes

EN

Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress

Parties to the Cartagena Protocol that are not yet Party to the Supplementary Protocol are also invited to respond to the questions below

169. Is your country a Party to the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress?

No

EN

170. If you answered No to question 169, is there any national process in place towards becoming a Party to the Supplementary Protocol?

Yes

EN

171. Has your country introduced the necessary measures for the implementation of the Supplementary Protocol?

No measures have yet been taken

EN

172. Which instruments are in place for the implementation of the Supplementary Protocol?

173. Does your country have administrative or legal instruments that require response measures to be taken

a. In case of damage resulting from LMOs?

Yes

EN

b. In case there is sufficient likelihood that damage will result if response measures are not taken?

Yes

EN

174. If you answered Yes to question 173a, do these instruments impose requirements on an operator (select all that apply)?

Yes, the operator must inform the competent authority of the damage
Yes, the operator must evaluate the damage
Yes, the operator must take response measures
Yes, other requirements

175. If you answered Yes to question 173a, do these instruments require the operator to take response measures to avoid damage?

Yes

EN

176. If you answered Yes to question 173a or 173b, do these instruments provide for a definition of “operator”?

Yes

EN

177. If you answered Yes to question 176, which of the following could be an ‘operator’ (select all that apply)?

Permit holder
Person who placed the LMO on the market
Developer
Producer
Notifier
Exporter
Importer
Carrier
Supplier

178. Has a competent authority been identified for carrying out the functions set out in the Supplementary Protocol?

No

EN

179. If you answered Yes to question 178, what measures may the competent authority take (select all that apply)?

180. Does your country have measures in place to provide for financial security for damage resulting from LMOs?

Yes

EN

181. If you answered Yes to question 180, what type of financial security measures are in place (select all that apply)?

Requirement to provide evidence for secure source of funding
Mandatory insurance

182. Does your country have rules and procedures on civil liability that address damage resulting from LMOs, or has such damage been recognized in court rulings (select all that apply)?

Yes, in a civil liability instrument

183. Have there been any occurrences of damage resulting from LMOs in your country?

No

EN

184. If you answered Yes to question 183, have response measures been taken?

185. Here you may provide further details on any activities undertaken in your country towards the implementation of the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress

A date, la République de Guinée n’est pas Partie au Protocole additionnel de Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur sur la responsabilité et la réparation. Cependant le processus devant permettre au pays d’adhérer audit Protocole est en cours.

FR

Other information

186. Please use this field to provide any other information on issues related to national implementation of the Protocol, including any obstacles or impediments encountered.

186. Vous pouvez fournir ici de plus amples informations sur les questions relatives à la mise en œuvre du Protocole de Cartagena et du Protocole additionnel à l’échelle nationale, y compris les obstacles et les difficultés rencontrés. L’instabilité institutionnelle, la non mise en place du Comité Institutionnelle de Biosécurité au niveau des Départements concernés par le sujet, l’insuffisance du personnel dédié aux question Biosécurité, l’inexistence de Laboratoires de biotechnologie, la faible mobilisations des ressources financières internes ainsi le faible niveau d’information des acteurs sur les enjeux de la Biosécurité constituent, au niveau national, les difficultés rencontrées dans la mise en œuvre des dispositions du Protocole de Cartagena.

FR

Comments on reporting format

187. Please use this field to provide any other information on difficulties that you have encountered in filling in this report.

En réalité le groupe des consultants n’a pas rencontré de difficultés significatives en lien avec le format du rapport.

FR

This record has been deleted. Since it is linked to a published record, it is available here for reference purposes only.

This document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.

Comparing version with latest version 1

Quick links

Need help?

THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

Quick Links

Topics

Information

A part of

This record has been deleted. Since it is linked to a published record, it is available here for reference purposes only.

This document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.

Comparing version with latest version 1 Close comparison

Quick links

Need help?

THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

Quick Links

Topics

Information

A part of

Comparing version with latest version 1